This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy. We won't track your information when you visit our site. But in order to comply with your preferences, we'll have to use just one tiny cookie so that you're not asked to make this choice again.

US Anti-Tank Missiles for Ukraine: Will It Just Be the Beginning?

The delivery of US anti-tank guided missiles to Ukraine may be America's first step in supplying the Ukrainian army with American lethal weapons, a Russian military expert told Sputnik.

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the US defense and diplomatic establishment had devised a plan to supply lethal arms to Ukraine. The weapons, characterized as 'defensive', may include Javelin man-portable anti-tank missiles, anti-aircraft weapons, and other advanced arms.
The US Joint Chiefs of Staff and Defense Secretary James Mattis support the plan, and it now awaits the approval of President Trump, who has yet to be briefed on its details. Officials told WSJ that a final decision from the President could take as long as several months to secure.

 

Speaking to Sputnik, Russian military expert Leonid Ivashov recalled that "the delivery of anti-tank guided missiles to the Ukrainian army was a project endorsed by former US President Barack Obama and pushed by Republican Senator John McCain."

"When the issue of supplying lethal weapons was being decided, the main focus was on the anti-tank guided missile deliveries," Ivashov said, referring to Washington's allegations about Russian tanks ostensibly being in place in eastern Ukraine's Donbass region at the time.

He pointed out that "the supply of the US anti-tank guided missiles to Ukraine may be followed by the delivery of other types of lethal weapons there."
At the same time, Ivashov said that the US arms supplies are just a small part of Kiev's process of upgrading and expanding its warchest.

"Right now, Ukraine is developing its military and industrial complex, which regularly supplies armored vehicles, tanks and helicopters [to the Ukrainian army]. In this vein, the country's army's armament mainly depends on the domestic defense industry," Ivashov said.

Thierry Mariani, a member of France's center-right Republicans party, told Sputnik on Tuesday that the US plan to supply Ukraine with weapons is "extremely dangerous" and that Ukrainian President Poroshenko may use these arms to wage a new war in Donbass to improve his approval rating in the run-up to the presidential election in the country.

"On Ukraine, we have to remember that the presidential election is approaching and President Poroshenko's situation is not so good. Poroshenko, who failed in his economic and anti-corruption reforms, will try to use a new war to win the election. Actually, I am afraid that we may witness a new war in Donbass next year. In this context, the US arms deliveries to Ukraine are extremely dangerous,” Mariani said.

If the war moves beyond its current relative stalemate, the consequences could prove especially deadly. The front lines of the conflict are less than 10 kilometers to the city of Donetsk, which had a pre-war population of nearly a million people. While hundreds of thousands have fled the conflict, the elderly and mobility-impaired haven't had this opportunity.

USserviceman teaches Ukrainian soldiers how to give emergency medical aid during the Rapid Trident/Saber Guardian 2015 military exercises at the International Peacekeeping and Security Centre base outside Lviv, Ukraine, Friday, July 24, 2015

Source: sputniknews

Share This Post

related posts

On Top