This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy. We won't track your information when you visit our site. But in order to comply with your preferences, we'll have to use just one tiny cookie so that you're not asked to make this choice again.

Have a third child, get free land from government in Italy

Italy's populist government plans to reward parents who have a third child by awarding them a piece of land, in a bid to reverse the country's plummeting birth rate, media reported on Wednesday.

The plan, cooked up by the far-right League and included in the draft budget for next year, would see the state concede parcels of agricultural land for 20 years to parents who have a third child between 2019 and 2021.

 

"They say that Italians have few children and that something is needed to turn the trend around," said Agriculture Minister Gian Marco Centinaio.
"That's why the ministry wants to contribute, favouring rural areas in particular, where people still have children," he told the media.

Italy has the lowest birthrate in Europe. Last year some 464,000 births were registered, a record low, leaving Italy with a significantly older population and a demographic time bomb.

The land-for-children idea is supported by Italy's ultra-Catholic families minister Lorenzo Fontana, who said however that it will be limited to married couples, rather than those in civil unions.

Political commentators said it would not be easy, as the law provides civil unions with most of the same rights as marriage.

Foreigners interested in the offer would need to have been resident in Italy for at least 10 years.

According to Coldiretti, the association of Italian agricultural companies, the state owns half a million hectares (1.2 million acres) of farmland worth nearly 10 billion euros (USD 11.3 billion).

"Why give them away rather than sell them, particularly at a moment when all that money could go towards the government's many (and costly) pledges?" asked the Corriere della Sera daily.

Because "for the most part, the lands are what is left at the bottom of the barrel," it said, adding that in some cases local councils were currently having to shell out for their upkeep.

Source: tribuneindia

Share This Post

related posts

On Top